03 · The Evidence
Four findings, one direction.
Finding 01 · The signal strengthens
Math is the strongest, most consistent signal, and the edge compared to matched schools grows from baseline through a year after the program ends.
+2.1ppto→+3.8pp
How far AMA's growth outpaces the growth of matched schools: at baseline, then one year after program
AMA schools' math-proficiency edge over their matched schools grew from 2.1 to 3.8 percentage points, from their baseline year to one year post-program.
As math-proficiency gains remain elusive for many schools, AMA schools are outperforming their peer schools on proficiency growth.
Finding 02 · The both/and
Everyone gains in math. The students AMA centers gain most.
-
All students
+5.8pp
Math-proficiency growth, baseline to one year after the program.
AMA +5.8pp · matched schools +4.1pp
-
Students with disabilities
+4.1pp
Math-proficiency growth, baseline to one year post-program.
AMA +4.1pp · matched schools +3.2pp
-
Black students
+6.0pp
Math-proficiency growth, baseline to one year post-program.
AMA +6.0pp · matched schools +4.6pp
-
Latino students
+5.9pp
Latino students sustained the strongest math-growth trajectory of the years of the study.
AMA +5.9pp · matched schools +3.3pp
Finding 03 · Belonging shows up in the data
Suspensions and chronic absenteeism decrease at several schools as achievement rises.
24.7%to→10.4%
Black-student suspension rate at Excel Academy (MA), while achievement rose
Cohort 3 schools reduced chronic absenteeism across every student group one year out. Excel Academy (MA) cut Black-student suspension rates from 24.7% to 10.4% while raising achievement.
Fewer students missing school creates more opportunities to learn.
Finding 04 · The model is improving
Each cohort is stronger than the last.
Cohort 3 schools outperformed Cohort 2 across math, ELA, and chronic absenteeism, reflecting AMA's shift toward team-based enrollment and deeper problem-solving support.
The program isn't just working; it's learning.